|
I wonder what comes to
mind when you think of the book of Ruth? A love story? Two widows
arriving bereft from a foreign land? The gathering of corn after
the harvest? The generosity of Boaz the wealthy farmer, or perhaps
Ruth herself, the ancestress of our Lord Jesus?
For myself, I see the golden
fields of corn such as those painted in The Gleaners by
the French artist Millet. It is painted in colours, which evoke
the soft, warm light that is seen towards the end of day, making
the world look full and beautiful. It features three peasant women,
prominent in the foreground, stooping to glean the last scraps of
the harvest. Their gaze does not meet the viewer and their faces
are hidden beneath their peasant caps. Indeed they are bent over
like the corn in the wind. Their earthy figures blend into the colours
of the piece, ingraining them well into the scene.
This painting has a resonance
with the story of Ruth, gathering the leavings after Boaz' workers
had finished harvesting the crops. In Leviticus we read that ‘When
you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field
to its very border, neither shall you gather the gleanings after
your harvest.' Instead they were to be left for ‘the poor and the
sojourner'. But what had happened to Ruth that she found herself
in this humble position?
The story is set in the time
of the Judges. This period in the history of the Israelites was
characterised by a time of moral degeneracy, national disunity and
many occasions of foreign oppression. The book of Ruth reflects
a time of peace between Israel and Moab. It gives a series of intimate
glimpses into the lives of an Israelite family and presents a remnant
of faith in an otherwise dark era of Israelite history.
A famine had hit the land
and even Bethlehem, which was traditionally very fertile, producing
abundant harvests, was now suffering great hardship. The town of
Bethlehem meant ‘house of bread' but at this time it became a ‘house
of no bread'. An Israelite named Elimelech and his wife Naomi had
left this area and had travelled to Moab. Perhaps his intentions
had been to protect his family. We may have some insight into his
reasons for leaving, when we consider the names of his two sons.
Mahlon, means ‘to be sick' and Kilion means ‘failing', ‘pining'
or even ‘annihilation'. His intention may have been to save the
lives of these frail sons. However, for a God-fearing Israelite,
Moab was not the place to go for a holiday, let alone take his family
to live there! We can even detect a sense of tension, for there
may have been temptation to change allegiance: to turn away from
Yahweh and to turn towards foreign gods, such as those of Baal who
was closely linked with fertility.
Their new life in Moab
led to a bitter-sweet mix of joy and sadness. Elimelech died, his
two sons married Moabite girls: Orpah and Ruth but then, in turn,
the sickly pair Mahlon and Kilion found their graves in foreign
lands. What emotions Naomi must have experienced. What was left
for her?
Only to return to her home
in Judah where she had left her heart. Especially in this patriarchal
society, she was lost because she had no heir, no-one to protect
or provide for her. It is no wonder that she wanted her name Naomi,
which means ‘pleasant', to be changed to ‘ bitterness'.
|
|
It is at this point of return
that we find Ruth and Naomi needing the support of El Shaddai, God
Almighty, to provide refuge for them. And so we return to where
we began – Ruth collecting the remnants, the left-overs.
Widowed, destitute, poor
and vulnerable, they had to rely on the laws of Israel that allowed
them to collect the remains after a day's harvesting. It seemed
by chance that Ruth chose Boaz's field for her work. As we read
the story we realise that it was God's provision that had led her
to this place. God's plan was about to be unfurled and the story
moved from what God had provided for the two women to
whom God had provided for them.
Boaz the wealthy farmer had
deep-seated qualities of generosity and kindness. As Ruth gathered
up the grain, Boaz gently encouraged his workers not to embarrass
her and even to provide for her by pulling out some stalks for her
from the bundles. Boaz was the epitome of a godly man whose faith
was real. For him there was no gap between the spiritual and the
material, the secular and the sacred. He stayed loyal at the time
of famine, remaining in Bethlehem.
He was obedient to God's
laws and sensitively provided a safe haven for the girls involved
in the gleaning. His hospitality was overwhelming. He did not treat
Ruth as a foreigner but sat and ate with her. Calling her ‘daughter',
he made her feel welcome. Boaz was ‘ Mr. Right ' for Ruth and Naomi.
He was a channel ideally suited to be the means for God's loving
kindness and favour to be lavished upon them.
Boaz, their kinsman-redeemer,
prefigures our kinsman-redeemer, the Lord Jesus. He was obedient.
He lived in perfect submission to the law of the Lord and his Father's
will. He was welcoming to all who took refuge in him. He ate at
the table of tax collectors and sinners, sensitively dealing with
each one. The invitation to Ruth to eat bread and wine resonates
with Jesus' call at the Last Supper and for all to come to his table.
Jesus, too, was generous. The author of Ruth tells us ‘she ate all
she wanted and had some left over', reminding us of the feeding
of the five thousand and the baskets full to overflowing.
Towards the end of the book
of Ruth, Naomi also refers to a ‘kinsman-redeemer', who is a small
bundle in her arms. This time she is looking at the child of Ruth
and Boaz, Obed. When she first returned to Bethlehem, she was without
hope, immersed in her bitterness but through God's loving kindness
she too was restored. Obed was to be the father of Jesse and grand-father
of David, whose line would lead to Jesus. It is not by accident
that Ruth decided to gather the remnants in the fields belonging
to Boaz. God had a plan in bringing a Moabitess to be part of that
family. She was from a scandalous nation with a poor pedigree in
relation to Israel, but God did not use the rich and influential
but the poor, unlikely and apparently insignificant. God specialises
in the remnants, the left-overs and those whose lives are in tatters.
He longs to meet each one of us at our point of need, whatever that
may be, and it is as we begin to recognise him as our Kinsman-redeemer,
that he can lavish us with his loving-kindness, redeem, restore
and make us whole again. Amen.
|