|
On asking Canon Eric just
how long you are used to in terms of the sermon, he started off
by saying 40 minutes – but don't worry, he was joking. Actually
he said probably about 10 minutes, but I shall be a little shorter
if you will excuse me. During my time in Plymouth I was a quarterly
preacher at our local URC church and after several such services,
I was standing at the door of the church afterwards when two ladies
came up to me and one said how much they enjoyed having me, and
then the other said, yes it meant they got home early for their
lunch. It's always good to know the truth.
May I begin by thanking Canon
Eric and your good selves for inviting me to be part of this festival
evensong, for the Feast of St Aldhelm? When asked to choose some
readings, I must admit to thinking about choosing the words of Our
Lord, that a prophet is never acceptable in his own country.* But
I resisted the temptation, and certainly hope that it isn't true
in this case anyway. I certainly can't be called what St Aldhelm
was called by the Venerable Bede – a wonder of erudition – but
we will do our best.
Our first reading from the
prophet Micah [this is what Yahweh asks of you, only this, that
you act justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God] has
been my leitmotif since my ordination. They are such beautifully
encouraging words, and an excellent way of witnessing to the gospel.
They are also words which I am sure St Aldhelm would have appreciated.
We don't know that much about him really, but it is possible to
get quite a good picture of how he was, and how he related to his
times and society. As far as we know he was the first Anglo-Saxon
to write in Latin verse, but you will forgive me for not quoting
from one of his most famous works where he has 101 riddles in Latin
hexameters, each of them a complete picture, and one of them running
to 83 lines. So he was a bishop after all!
We are told that even as
an old man he showed great activity and energy in his pastoral care
of the community. He was an observant man, aware of his times and
always looking to see how best the Church might respond. He noticed
for instance that when his community of monks were celebrating the
Eucharist, many of the ordinary people would not attend, preferring
to go from house to house for a good gossip. Well, times have not
changed there then. He understood that basic principle of life,
that if people don't come to you [possibly for very good reasons]
then you need to go to them, to be where they are.
And so we are told that he would position himself on a bridge that
people would have to use, and acting as a minstrel would sing some
of the popular songs of his times. He would gradually introduce songs
of a more serious nature. The bit I really like is that when he felt
attention was flagging, he would intersperse the songs with bits of
clowning to draw attention to his message – something our modern bishops
might like to think about. |
|
I guess he really took
to heart St Paul's injunction to be all things to all people. Because
alongside this musical ability and sensitivity and alertness to
the people of his time, was an incredible austerity. The other picture
of him that I carry around in my mind is his tendency to recite
the entire Psalter standing up to his neck in ice cold water – an
example I regret to say I have not as yet followed.
Whatever else he was, he
was undoubtedly a wonderful combination of simplicity, energy and
astuteness. He had a sense of fun and was musically talented. He
obviously had a good brain. But he could be difficult and certainly
challenging, as one of his letters to King Geraint displays: ‘acrimonious'
is the word often used of that letter. He wasn't a push-over. But
he used all those gifts to come alongside people and challenge them
to think again about what was really important in life. What he
said obviously balanced with the sort of person he was and the life
he led: he carried both the mark of a true Christian and of someone
who could be trusted. He seems to have displayed remarkable common
sense, which as always has a strong streak of justice running through
it, and so he secured for his community the right to be able to
elect their own Abbot for themselves. This was balanced with a sense
of the order of things, and of dedication and commitment to a path
that was not always of his choosing. He seems to have been reluctant
to become a bishop, but bowed to pressure. Sensibly he then wished
to resign as Abbot of Malmesbury but was persuaded by his brother
monks not to do so.
The imagery of a wandering
minstrel certainly suited his style both as abbot and as bishop,
as he saw it as integral to his roles that he should visit and be
with those whose way of life he sought to lead. So he would move
around the various houses of prayer that he established, and throughout
his diocese. Indeed it was on one such journey that he was to die
in the church at Doulting on this day in 709. When one thinks of
him in relation to our gospel reading, then you know he would have
been alongside Jesus and the children, their presence not at all
an embarrassment or a hindrance to the message, but rather the means
of witnessing to it. The qualities, gifts, values and faith of St
Aldhelm are very much needed in our world today, and in particular
in the Church. His life remains a shining light, 1,300 years later,
and one which we would do well to follow.
* Father Barry is a ‘Sherborne boy', and attended St Aldhelm's
School here. |